The Isleten peninsula in the municipality of Seedorf, Uri, has become the center of a heated political debate as residents prepare to vote on the "Isleten for all" initiative on November 24.
The initiative seeks to stop the ambitious tourism project proposed by Egyptian billionaire Samih Sawiris, which includes a marina, vacation apartments, and a hotel. The project has faced significant opposition, particularly from the Green Party, who argue that it threatens the natural landscape and promotes exclusive tourism for the wealthy.
Sawiris, a seasoned investor known for transforming the small resort of Andermatt into a thriving destination, faces challenges as his project must navigate a public referendum. Despite reducing the project's size by 30% earlier this year, resistance remains strong. The Green Party's initiative aims to preserve the area for "soft tourism," advocating for developments that would benefit the local community rather than cater to affluent tourists.
The campaign surrounding the referendum has seen both proponents and opponents of the project engage in a war of words, with accusations of misinformation flying between the two camps. Supporters of the "Isleten for all" initiative have circulated flyers outlining their vision for the peninsula, which includes options for small businesses, camping, and various recreational activities. In contrast, Sawiris' team has responded with their own materials, labeling the claims made by the initiative's supporters as "false statements" and emphasizing their commitment to adhering to all relevant planning and environmental regulations.
Sawiris' company, Isen AG, has sought to clarify misconceptions about the project, asserting that it is not intended to be a luxury resort exclusively for the wealthy. Instead, they claim that the planned hotel will fall within the three- to four-star range, aiming to create a "natural, publicly accessible resort for all the people of Uri." This assertion is critical as it attempts to counter the narrative that the project would only serve the interests of affluent tourists, a point that has been a central theme in the opposition's campaign.
The debate over the Isleten project involves legal implications as well. Critics, including representatives from the Landscape Conservation Foundation, have voiced strong opposition, citing the area's designation as a national treasure and its inclusion in the Federal Inventory of Protected Landscapes. They argue that the unique landscape must be preserved for future generations, and any development could harm its ecological integrity.
Legal action has been threatened against the project, with opponents asserting that the construction plans violate environmental protections. This legal dimension adds another layer of complexity to the situation, as Sawiris must navigate not only public opinion but also potential legal hurdles that could impede or halt the project altogether. The outcome of the referendum will be pivotal, as a favorable vote for the initiative could effectively end Sawiris' aspirations for the Isleten peninsula.
The stakes are high for the local economy, as Sawiris' project promises significant investment and job creation in the region. The cantonal council of Uri has expressed support for the construction, indicating a belief in the potential economic benefits that the tourism facility could bring. However, the opposition argues that the project would cater primarily to wealthy tourists, leaving local residents with little to gain.
The contrasting visions for Isleten reflect broader tensions in many communities facing similar development proposals. Proponents of the project argue that it could revitalize the local economy, attract visitors, and create jobs, while opponents fear that it would lead to gentrification and the loss of local character. As the referendum date approaches, the community remains divided, with both sides intensifying their efforts to sway public opinion.
The outcome of the referendum on November 24 will not only determine the fate of Sawiris' Isleten project but also set a precedent for future developments in the region. As communities grapple with the balance between economic growth and environmental preservation, the decision made by the people of Uri could influence similar debates across Switzerland and beyond.